There is a connection to “Myth of autonomy”, it relates back to Haas and what she says about the myth.

When results are presented they should follow the same order as the conclusion so it provides more clarity and organization to the writing.

Each conclusion should be followed with evidence and background information in order to provide credibility to any claims that are made.

In the discussion it is important to explain the meaning of the results because the reader should not be confused throughout the text. The results should be clear throughout the paper so the reader can thoroughly understand the content at hand.

Common information that most readers would be able to understand could insult and effect the reader throughout the text. It is easier just to talk about the information at hand rather than trying to explain the background.

In certain texts, conclusion may not be necessary. Instead, it would be sufficient to end the discussion with a concluding sentence that suggests lines of research reported in the paper.

ENG110I

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.